Thursday, November 19, 2009

Magic Tilt Trailer Registration Number

Education Innovation and Innovation in Ferrol

Today Thursday 12 November I was invited by the Ferrolterra Business Association to develop a working breakfast in Ferrol in which we analyzed the potential innovation offers us to weather the storm. Entrepreneurs and managers of all types of companies (some of which, I have been pleasantly surprised, and had read my book "Matter of Survival"). An exhibition, a café and an exchange of ideas moderated by Jorge Juárez, the director of the School of Business Caixanova in A Coruña. November 11

Will Starting Exercise Effect My Menstural Cycle

Innovation Skills Innovation

Yesterday I shared a session with students in the course of Innovation skills that CEO (Confederación de Empresarios de Ourense) developed at the University. A total of 75 students that took me a good memory for their enthusiasm and willingness to learn. And the whole detail Susana Gomez and Juan José Mills (Secretary General of the CEO), who also participate as teachers in the course, make a hole in their complicated schedules to share the session with all of us.

Size Standard Suitcase

Ourense with those of DBP

On Thursday 12 November I had the opportunity to share experiences innovation with students of the Advanced Management Program at the School of Business Caixanova in A Coruña. Galician Directors of relevant organizations (such as Feiraco, Cofaga, Actemsa, Caixanova, R, Leite Rio, Vego, Congalsa, Aenor ...) and very pleasant people (and experts in football!). I shared the day with Alorda Álvaro González y con Franc Ponti , a lo largo de la cual mostramos nuestros puntos de vista y experiencias sobre innovación, valor y creatividad.

Diagram Of Viking Longboats

Coruña Mediterráeno Conference on the banks of

En el mes de octubre he vuelto a tener el placer de recorrer diferentes localidades de la Comunidad Valenciana para compartir con directivos y empresarios experiencias sobre la innovación. Una vez más, la iniciativa ha surgido de los amigos de Camernova (el grupo de trabajo sobre Innovación de las Cámaras de Comercio de la Comunidad). La agenda no me ha permitido llegar a tantos puntos como la vez anterior (aunque prometo hacer a hole to get back with friends from those places) but this time we have had the opportunity to share ideas with several hundred people in Alicante, Denia, Alcoy, Valencia and Castellon. The crisis is hitting the friends of the Comunidad Valenciana, but as Einstein said, we will be able to turn it into opportunity.

Thursday, November 5, 2009

Composit Risk Managment Basic Exam Answers

The drug addict who did not acknowledge his problem

We commented at the session devoted to the crisis with Professor Tamames that massive and coordinated implementation of public policies to cushion the effects of the crisis in 2008 and 2009 has contributed to prevent the collapse of the system. Led by the United States the major world governments have developed an unprecedented policy stimulus in history.

The patient was about to die by overdose death has been avoided but has not solved the problem of drug dependence.

The drug has been on the verge of ending a patient's life is money. The easy money era began in early 2000 with the policies of Alan Greenspan after the dotcom crisis and slowing U.S. economy after the September 11th attacks, it generated an addiction to money that led to the widespread borrowing hundreds of millions business and individuals in all world. Easy money and plenty for everyone.

drug effects have wanted to solve with drugs. Central banks have injected large doses of money to avoid collapse. Governments have not wanted the addict suffers withdrawal symptoms, instead of dizziness, vomiting, and "monkey" has been chosen intravenously inject more money, hoping that after seeing "the ears of the wolf" the patient recognize their excesses and abandon their addiction.

But sooner or later we will have to confront the problem, the first step in solving an addiction is recognizing it. No doubt you have removed the drug from the market (Money), given the excessive borrowing and careless investments made by many in the era of easy money have created deflationary process if it is larger than we have suffered (falling prices of all assets) through a widespread deleveraging for fear that prices of these assets continue to fall.

Public money has avoided the massive deleveraging and falling prices. But has solved the problem? The bad assets do not regenerate easily, bad investments will continue to be yesterday morning. Sooner or later the disinflationary process will, for the excesses committed no solution. Another money dose the patient has calmed down, but not eliminated the problem. Sooner or later they will recognize that he has committed excesses and be aware that he has to pay for it.

yesterday, the New York University professor Nouriel Roubini (one of the first economists who warned that we came up because of subprime mortgages) has reminded us that we are living in "a bubble in all asset classes" . The industrial overcapacity that easy money has led threatens to generate a major deflationary forces. The price of many assets held by public policy, but the underlying problem is still there: the toxic assets still toxic (the housing market is still not tight, there is now talk of a new wave of subprime with falling prices of non-residential real estate, offices, industrial buildings ...) on automakers, appliance ... The risk of deflation is very present.

problems
Fed
Other prestigious economists, such as Philipp Bagus and Markus Schiml, talk about the complex dilemmas facing the Federal Reserve, monetary policy as aggressive, keep the patient alive, but may end with the doctor's life. Even the Fed itself could become insolvent. The

"Quality" of the balance sheet of the U.S. central bank has deteriorated sharply with the policies implemented to prevent the collapse (the rescue of the banking system). It has also increased the "quantity" of the Fed balance sheet, with the massive purchase of toxic assets of banks (the famous mortgage-backed securities or mortgage-backed securities).

These policies have worked in the short term, but to really be effective, these assets are to "detoxify", because otherwise the only thing is we managed to shift the risks of private banking system to the large central public bank. If not fix the problem background (the value of toxic assets) they simply postponed the problem, avoiding the collapse today, but hopeless for tomorrow. Aggravated by the fact that now the "bad banks" (bad bank) are public.

But back to the "drug" (the money shot). Central banks (European Central Bank among them) and advised us to let us go thinking about a scenario in which it will gradually withdrawing stimulus measures exceptional. It is logical, because the money is not an unlimited resource. Many people still think that public support is no end: that the Plan E is continually renewed, to be renewed plans for multiple sectors, which will continue giving aid to the purchase of vehicles, the State will save the banks that have problems ....

I encourage everyone to go thinking about the next stage. A scenario in which the stimuli are disappearing.

What can the Fed?

On the one hand, it could, says Bagus, "restore the strength of the central bank's balance sheet." This involves reducing the size and improve the quality of its balance sheet. But how do so without the reversal of those policies again expose the financial system into chaos? As stated above, the problem of fund has not been solved, just postponed.
measures central banks have not solved the problem: they have simply delayed the inevitable. Bagus

defends the brave act to reach the bottom model case: return to the situation before the crisis, ie to return to private banks' toxic assets and bankrupt financial institutions have to fail. "

is very difficult for a drug addict and their environment to recognize the reality, your problem. When this happens the pain is intense. It may be necessary that the system suffers in order to solve the problem definitively. Bagus therefore intends to solve the crisis with liberal measures and proposes measures as the market recapitalization, nationalization or restructuring of the ownership of the banks through the direct conversion of creditors into shareholders.

green shoots

One thing is clear: we have not learned any lesson. Just look at the stock market to realize what has grown since March. That yes, many seem to ignore that this growth is due in part to the stream of global liquidity injected by central banks policies and incentive policies.

not remember who said when he started talking about the only green shoots green shoot that saw the government was that of who had smoked marijuana to say that the economy was emerging from the crisis.

Perhaps he was right. Green shoots have emerged of marijuana have a material effect on who are the smokers. There is much "in place" to live in a party (investors in the stock market, dealers car sales held in October, the chairmen of the big English banks announcing results, the finance ministers presenting prospects for 2010 ...). But the party may end soon. Enjoy your spree a few months. Disappear when the effects of green buds of marijuana (the effects of monetary policies and incentive programs) back to reality. Enrique de

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Hjundai Accent T4 Turbo

Attract brain is not the same as creative ideas to attract heads

In 2004 we developed a special tax regime in order to attract talent. Foreign professionals to come to Spain with his brain to produce taxable fixed rate of 24% on income generated in our country. But rather than surround the brain that generate ideas we have built up heads that top corners.

The measure was initially designed to attract scientists took advantage of football clubs to implement these tax concessions to foreign stars coming to our league. One of the first to benefit was David Beckham, who incidentally set (without taking royalties for it) his name to a English law that claims more than 60,000 per year pays 43% of farm income while a galaxy of Real Madrid only 24% taxed . Solidarity, equity and justice.

The PSOE has agreed with BNG, ICV and IU's revision of the Law for displaced workers to Spain with incomes above 600,000 euros taxed general income tax of 43% and not 24%, as happened to now.
has been set quite a stir with the news, but not because the amendment would prevent the arrival of new scientists to help build a new production model, developing biotechnology patents or interfaces for video games, but because football clubs are complaining because they may lose their stars. In his day

a heated debate over whether it was ethical or not, during the economic crisis, with hundreds of thousands of English losing their jobs, Real Madrid was spent hundreds of millions of euros clocking stars (for stars in Alcorcón .) At that time, said a private entity can do whatever he wants with his money. I share it. But they can not do the same with everyone's money: 19% difference between the special type which were being used and paying other professionals, is money removed from highways, hospitals, kindergartens and R & D. A galactic alien who has been receiving the past five years 10 million per year was leaving to join a farm 1.9 million euros (or 9.5 million over 5 years).

The President of the Professional Football League (association of clubs) veiled threat to strike, knowing that a Sunday without football can generate a social buzz than a general strike call by the unions. English football says "an amendment to the special impatriates will imply a bill of more than one hundred million euros, as in the case will be taken to take the road to face this choice, even have to stop racing. "

First we must clarify what is meant by" English football. "The measure will affect only the coffers of the big clubs (Real Madrid, Barcelona, \u200b\u200bSevilla, Valencia, Athletico ...) which are foreigners who have soils receiving several million euros.

Second, claims that the bill of 100 million euros (Cristiano Ronaldo, so to speak) do not pay the big clubs, but the pay among all taxpayers. A measure of justice and solidarity in times of crisis, unemployment and deficits in public accounts.

Third, no club should pay a euro only legislative change if negotiated contracts with their stars as they do the vast majority of workers. This invention salary "tax free" also generates a negative effect in terms of image, for other workers who see amounts withheld on the payroll, pay when making his statement, etc. Of course, as long as the picture drawn with the star and win the favor of his hobbies with other people's money (the partners in the case of Madrid and Barca) is signed to star whatever and however.

Fourth, the reform would not affect the last galaxy have come to our club, as the Portuguese Cristiano Ronaldo or Zlatan Ibrahimovic Swedish, because the new rule is not retroactive and will only apply to contracts signed from next January 1, 2010.

Fifth, Astiazarán said that "if the league removes this tax would become less interesting, less consumption would pay television and so chains, less interest from sponsors, less flow to the stadiums and the State would enter less tax. " A statement full of cynicism. Delete a preferential taxation for these professionals, in no way implies that the foreign stars will stop coming to our league (and, assuming they are the ones that fill the English stadiums and not Casillas, Villa, Iniesta, Xabi ... sold fewer tickets, fewer games pay per view, etc..), but simply that the major football clubs should be a bit more to those foreign stars. To see if Madrid is now able to pay a few million euros a year CR9 when his signing has spent more than 100).

Sixth, it happens that Spain is the country with lower tax costs for foreign players, according to a report by Ernst & Young Lawyers, which compares the taxation supporting football clubs by players from Germany United Kingdom, France, Italy, Netherlands and Spain. Only the players in the Netherlands are taxed less. If it were true tax link - featuring stars, the gold would last ball kicking in the land of tulips and there would be big players in the English Premiere.

need to import brains, not idiots.

Etiquette To Send Having A Baby Card

foolish proposals

The output of the crisis undoubtedly requires innovative ideas and creative proposals . The proposal made Tuesday by Secretary General of CCOO, Ignacio Fernandez Toxo, is very interesting, except for one important nuance.

Fernández Toxo proposed to reduce working hours to create jobs. It is an idea which I've been talking a long time, since back in the late 90's, while working in the field of Internet, ICT, efficiency, e-Business, etc.., As many alumni will recall, spoke of "price efficiency" capital firms invest in technology to the detriment of human capital, the technology allows for efficiency (do more with less) and the concentration of GDP in advanced economies informational services (financial products, telecommunications, entertainment digital, etc.). to the detriment of physical products (manufacture of cars, furniture, etc.) has result in more advanced countries produce more (generate more revenue) with fewer people. The price of such efficiency is unemployment. Electronic banking allows banks to meet twice as many customers today than 15 years ago, with half of employees, the online ticketing and electronic invoicing have allowed airlines to cut staff, the RFID (radio frequency) that little to incorporate some food containers, cleaning products, etc. will eliminate the figure of the tellers and cashiers in supermarkets. As I mentioned in detail in "The last straw" a society becoming more efficient by the use of technology has to redefine working hours because otherwise there will be no work for everyone. People have to work 3 or 4 days a week, or better, only half a day. The effect on society and the economy may be very interesting: more time for leisure (new businesses), more time for family, friends (human relations) and higher quality work in companies (less fatigue, less boredom .) Toxo

this car is targeted to the division of labor, but with a "shade" not agree at all: that this reduction in working hours without a corresponding reduction in salary and the state should cover the difference.

what's not outweighed the union at the time of making this proposal, if it was his desire to realize their dream of a state-led economy-style communist, or if on the contrary has been their lack of economic knowledge.

I know that the dream of every professional union is that others will pay for the work he does not perform, but to extend this ideal to the whole society does not think that's exactly what this country needs, here and now. Pay us all for not working could be a nice slogan to stand for election or to increase the number of union members. But clearly is nonsense.

First, because the idea that the State must pay us for doing nothing (or do the right thing) is unfortunately becoming increasingly common, the prevailing culture of least resistance in a country modeled on characters that appear in the reality-show by the cinnamon and then live the story. That if you know how to ride! , Say many young people who yearn to become someone who lives without sticking a stick into the water. Carca I know that when I say dream, but we get excited by work, create, innovate and culture of effort, to find gratification in what it has cost us and assess the outcome of the effort. We say that the state pay for less work I think is going in the opposite direction to the ideal that we transmit.

Second, the proposal seems senseless Toxo after seeing (as I said in my post from yesterday), as is the case of government: does not hold water on all sides. Toxo While calling for the state pay people for not working, the IMF warned of the problems he was getting into Spain because of his fiscal policy: the drop in revenues and increased social spending can become choking finance State (deficit and debt), Spain can enter into a long recession if mortgage their future.

Another thing is that the government redefined the concept of unemployment benefits and for part of the resources for a new formula in place to pay the unemployed to do nothing, you pay a company to articulate formulas for "splitting" four jobs in five, compensating workers who surrender part of their working time to create new jobs.

Keep the salary of a person (artificially) working less, delves into the great current problem of the English economy: the productivity of firms.
productivity should be part of the negotiation of agreements. In an environment where we see the problems of competitiveness of English companies in comparison with German, French, etc., While receiving messages from different international economists say wages in Spain are out of step with respect to the production (approximately 25%), in a scenario in which the solution is a 25% reduction or increase wages by 25% the result (what we produce each person), it is counterproductive to continue demanding wage increases (by "agreement") of 2%. Especially when deflation in Spain is a fact (ie, reducing the wages of people or simply not increasing them, workers do not lose purchasing power). Collective agreements will give the lace finish the ailing competitiveness of companies in this country. Even a questionable entity of any suspicion as the Bank of Spain recognizes that the collective bargaining system is one of the culprits of the destruction of a million jobs.

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

How To Add Miles To United

versus forecasts for 2010

November 2nd On Monday we held our annual meeting with ESEUNE renowned economist D. Ramon Tamames, during this time of the opening ceremony of the 2009-2010 academic promotions and Global Executive MBA MBA Business School ESEUNE.

Tamames A year ago we talked about the crisis and its effects, yesterday tried to discern among all the hypothetical recovery. Twelve

months ago were on the verge of collapse (after the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers on September 17, 2008). But the measures taken prevented the catastrophe: the central banks have injected liquidity into the system, governments reacted by raising deposit guarantees (preventing millions of people did queue at banks to withdraw their savings), have created funds dubious acquisition of financial assets to improve the health of banks and plans have materialized damping of the crisis (of the Plan E).

Today we talk about the recovery of the U.S. economy in the third quarter of 2009 grew by 3.5% (versus the third quarter 2008). But it is interesting to see how this news has excited more in Spain than American citizens themselves, many of which cast doubt on the recovery. First we must note that this growth is generated in comparison with a quarter black, as was the third in 2008 in the United States. It should also be aware that much of this growth is due to strong government support (such as Superplan to save the old car industry in Detroit), and all accompanied by a weak dollar favors U.S. exports. Hence, some economists like Paul Samuelson (first Nobel Prize in Economics in 1970) warn of the possibility a "W".

Spain 2010

But to return to Spain. The situation for 2010 looks very negative, but the situation in 2009. It is true that GDP will not bleed (but we note that the fall in 2009 was so important, that simply is not growing and highly disturbing in itself). The "shadows" of the English economy in 2010 will come from the hand of its banking system, which is already being challenged by an increasing number of international analysts. There are several reports that English banks hide their real rate of default (the debt of English banks is 800,000 million euros and 25% of the total, about 200,000 million-asset may correspond to "doubtful"), on the other side says that the stock of unsold homes is much greater than officially recognized, and it is certainly true that credit flows to businesses, freelancers and families.

buffer plans designed by the Government (8,000 million E Plan, the 5,000 million Ea Plan, aid to purchase cars ...) have a material effect (and thousands of miles of new sidewalks) positive ( containing the evolution of unemployment, active keeping hundreds of small businesses), but plans are very weak, with no real power to boost our economy and start taking advantage of this inertia.

Unemployment is our main problem. A few months ago when President Zapatero was asked if he feared for social unrest in Spain, with an unemployment rate that walks resolutely towards 20% of the population. His response to the journalist was to come to Spain and walked through the streets to see for himself that in Spain people lived very well.

Maybe that's where you're walking and the President. In cities such as Madrid, where they concentrate a large volume of public employees (civil servants at no time threatened their incomes, do not fear losing their jobs at all) the consumption level is still acceptable, the money flows, breathe shops, services work. But in other cities, towns and regions the outlook is really bleak. The people have not taken to the streets and crime has not fired for two reasons: we have a social system that allows people to continue living (unemployment benefits, free healthcare, free education ...), the families can pay their power and children can continue going to school.

On the other hand, the economy is still operating: the 600,000 checks help of 400 euros that the government had prepared were collected only 30,000. Many people not willing to do a training every day to receive that help .... it continues to make their money charging chapucitas B, lending a hand to the brother in the workshop, the brother in the bar ....

The economy acts as a buffer against the crisis but will aggravate the second big problem of Spain: the fall in government revenues endangers our welfare state (health and education will deteriorate, the Pension are threatened by the time ... but if they are a threat: the commitments that must be addressed in the next ten years if the economy remains stagnant, going to suck much of the already weak if revenue.

Within a year we have gone from 11,000 million budgeted to pay unemployment benefits to 35,000 million (or whatever it is, as stated Tamames, a half dozen's Madrid-Sevilla AVE.) An unemployment rate as high constrains the ability of a country to develop new infrastructure, modernize, invest in R & D, strengthening their universities, improve the health ... ..

The crisis has many ballots to worsen, the Government's ability to continue to act is limited, although Brussels authorize us to continue to have high deficits or continue to issue debt, the shock absorbers in the form of government stimulus for the economy will not be strong enough to revive the patient. In addition, if debt continued firing, we are not aware of one thing: one day will be paid. How?

Throughout the history of Spain as we have seen Mendizabal confiscations or the most recent privatization of large public companies that have allowed the state to reduce its debt. But now, what's left? How are we going to return in ten or twenty years, our debt? A government they have nothing left to sell to raise cash ... except, as I said Tamames, the savings banks. Will we see the seizure of the boxes? The political complexity that accompanies these curious entities (whose are? how much they cost? Who controls them?) situated in a very distant horizon this possibility.

The truth is that while we as government revenues shrink, we are witnessing a significant increase in budgetary allocations to pay unemployment benefits and debt repayment.

It's too late for reforms, but tomorrow will be even later

are few, and increasingly, those who question the urgent need for major reforms.

The first labor reform: the only way to recover apace part of the job losses (and relieve the state budget allowing further enhance the research, development, education, innovation ...). Stable job, permanent, temporary, precarious .... Anything but work. This is no time for discussion of the quality, but to talk about quantity. It takes a few million new jobs.

The second reform is in parallel: the reform of productivity. Change the production model is needed (to replace the brick and paella by the Biotechnology and renewable energy). But that change is almost a generation. While we changed the production model we can begin to change the mode of production: English companies inefficiency are well we are not competitive and we hampers productivity. We must improve the training of the lathe and CEO. And it is absolutely necessary to redefine the role of trade unions and the negotiation of agreements (geared towards productivity, competitiveness, etc.).. In short, a new production model is necessary, but a new way of producing is urgent (a new business model "e-volution")

The third thought that the country has to address is the role of the public. In recent years the English population has grown 20% and the number of staff by 100%. In some communities Regions (such as Andalusia and Extremadura) 30% of the working population is official. Need to Spain this high percentage? And above all, we can afford that luxury? Improving the efficiency of management is as important as improving the productivity of enterprises.

And finally, we have to think about market fragmentation. We are just over 40 million consumers ... in 17 micro-markets. Wall-Mart has said it does not come to Spain because it is a market, but 17. An American colleague hallucinated a few months ago when I had problems to manage a waste as simple as the oil industry: if you and your vans in Pamplona responsible for transportation of waste are occupied, while those of Vitoria are idle ... you can not make a phone call to come and support you: do not serve the licenses, the staff is not authorized, probably unaware of the processes to follow ....

After all, many of the things I commented on my post of March.

The European Commission sees no clear

Earlier today we met the EC forecasts for Spain: the English economy will shrink by 3.7% in 2009 and will continue to fall another 0.8% in 2010. Thereafter, in 2011, a negligible recovery of 1% (negligible after two years drop). According to Brussels in 2011 exceeded 20% unemployment: 1 in 5 people of working age can not. The recession will be with us several more quarters and only advanced economies like the Latvian, Lithuanian and Bulgarian as well as Spain take to leave the crisis.

The budget deficit will soar to 11.2% of GDP this year and remain at around 10% in 2010 due to falling tax revenues, increased unemployment benefits and anti-crisis measures, while debt increased from 39.7% in 2008 to 74% in 2011. This spectacular rise threatens the long-term sustainability public finances.

Brussels also warns against some of the tax measures have been taken. The elimination of tax returns (a reference to 400 euros) and the VAT increase may also have a negative impact on private consumption.

And again doubts come from outside our financial system: Brussels warns of an imminent rise in mortgage defaults that could jeopardize the correctness of the balances of banks heavily exposed to construction, which could have a negative impact on the real economy.

The Commission notes that Spain has continued to lose competitiveness in the crisis because wages have grown faster than productivity because the review clauses. Inadequate conventions to which we referred above may, depending on the EC, as in the past, a significant increase in long-term unemployment and reduce the potential growth potential of the English economy.

In short, get ready for a year very, very difficult.